Skip to main content

Lopezes failed to contain ABS's overhead; with Gaex still far exceeding gross profit, for how long will the Aboitizes and the Ayalas Forbear?

 

In corporate finance, there is a simple rule: when a firm’s overheads exceed its gross profit, survival depends not on operations but on patience. By 2025, ABS‑CBN had crossed that line.

The company reported a gross profit margin of 16.52%, producing gross profit of roughly ₱2.6 billion on consolidated revenues of ₱15.85 billion, even as revenues declined 9% year‑on‑year . Against this, administrative, corporate, and support costs remained structurally larger—helping drive a net loss of ₱4.72 billion and a net income margin of –29.76% for the year .

In a normal business, that arithmetic ends the discussion. Yet ABS‑CBN continues to operate, raising a different question: for how long will its financiers—among them institutions associated with the Aboitizes and the Ayalas—continue to forbear?


A Cost Base Built for a Bigger Company

ABS‑CBN’s overhead problem is not subtle. The firm remains profitable at the gross level, but general and administrative expenses, together with personnel and corporate overhead, exceed gross profit, ensuring losses before interest and impairments are considered .

The mismatch is historical. ABS‑CBN’s organisational scale was built during a period when free‑to‑air television delivered nationwide advertising dominance. That model once supported far higher revenues. In 2025, consolidated revenues fell to ₱15.85 billion, down from ₱17.33 billion in 2024, and well below pre‑franchise levels .

The company has cut costs—consolidated operating expenses fell 18% year‑on‑year to ₱20.48 billion—but not enough to realign overheads with today’s smaller revenue base .



Revenues That Have Reset Lower

The problem is not merely cost. Revenues themselves have structurally declined.

Content production and distribution grew 5% to ₱12.59 billion, driven by digital advertising, international licensing, films, and live events. But this growth was overwhelmed by the continued deterioration of cable and broadband, whose revenues fell 39% to ₱3.27 billion as subscriber losses continued .

The result is a business that still produces content demand—but at margins and scale that no longer support its administrative superstructure.


Why Creditors Continue to Forbear

Given these figures, why has ABS‑CBN not been forced into restructuring?

First, asset monetisation has substituted for earnings. In 2025, ABS‑CBN completed the sale of 30,000 square metres of its Quezon City property to Ayala Land, using proceeds to service bank loans and stabilise liquidity . These sales improved cash flow but did not change operating profitability.

Second, creditors have chosen patience. The company reported a current ratio of just 0.45, net debt‑to‑equity of 14.41×, and negative interest‑coverage of –2.50×, all of which would ordinarily trigger enforcement. Instead, loans were rolled over and covenants waived .

Third, ownership and institutional context matter. ABS‑CBN remains controlled by the Lopez group, while its lender ecosystem includes institutions closely associated with the Aboitiz and Ayala groups. Their involvement does not imply a formal guarantee—but it materially alters incentives. Forbearance preserves optionality in valuable content libraries and real estate that a forced liquidation would destroy.


The Costs of Continued Patience

Yet forbearance is not resolution. Shareholders’ equity shrank to just ₱747 million in 2025, down 70% year‑on‑year, producing a return on equity of –631% and leaving little buffer for further losses .

Cash from operations remained negative at ₱1.36 billion, with survival dependent on investing cash inflows from asset sales and continued refinancing . Operating losses have narrowed—but remain sizeable.

The longer overheads exceed gross profit, the harder it becomes for lenders to justify continued indulgence.


When Arithmetic Catches Up

ABS‑CBN today survives not because the income statement works, but because powerful creditors allow it to. So far, that patience—backed by asset value, reputational capital, and institutional ties—has outweighed the stark mathematics of the business.

But arithmetic is inexorable. Asset sales are finite. Debt tolerance is not unlimited. Unless overheads fall decisively below gross profit, or the balance sheet is structurally reworked, patience will eventually run out.

For now, ABS‑CBN exists in the space between financial logic and institutional mercy. Whether the Aboitizes and the Ayalas continue to forbear will determine how long that space remains open.

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes and is not investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

Power Over Press: How the Lopezes Recycled ₱50 Billion—and Left ABS‑CBN to Fend for Itself

  We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! Disclaimer:  This is for informational purposes and is  not  investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs. What the Lopez Group’s ₱50‑billion decision says about First Gen—and ABS‑CBN When Prime Infrastructure Capital Inc., led by Enrique Razon Jr., completed its ₱50‑billion acquisition of a controlling stake in First Gen’s gas business , it was widely framed as a landmark energy transaction. Less discussed—but no less consequential—was what the Lopez Group chose to do next with the proceeds. Rather than channeling the windfall toward shoring up ABS‑CBN Corp. , the group’s financially strained media arm, the Lopezes effectively recycled that capital back into the energy sector , partnering again with Prime Infra—this time in pumped‑storage hydropower projects that will take year...