Skip to main content

Posts

$CREC’s Numbers Make the Case for Reinvestment — For Now

  There is a difference between a company that withholds dividends because it must and one that does so because it still has better uses for capital. On the evidence of Citicore Renewable Energy Corporation’s 2025 numbers, CREC still belongs in the second camp. For now, at least, this looks less like a business denying shareholders cash and more like one still trying to turn capital into scale. That distinction matters. In the Philippine market, investors are often willing to tolerate light distributions only if they can see a credible buildout story in return. CREC’s report offers such a story in plain arithmetic: the company ended 2025 with 14 operating solar assets and 597.2 MW of installed capacity , while maintaining an extensive pipeline that includes 2,898 MW of solar and 45 MW of wind under construction , plus 540 MW of wind in advanced development . It also secured 1,212 MW of additional renewable energy capacity through the Department of Energy’s Green Energy Auction Pr...
Recent posts

When silence itself becomes the story at Lopez Holdings

  There are moments in capital markets when the most revealing disclosure is the one that never arrives . That is where Lopez Holdings Corporation (LPZ) now appears to stand: a flagship listed holding company whose chairman and chief executive, Federico “Piki” Lopez , was reported to have been removed as president of Lopez Inc. , the group’s private controlling shareholder and ultimate parent, only for a Mandaluyong court to stop the move through injunctive relief. Public reports say the challenged board resolutions were passed on February 27, 2026 , and that the court’s writ dated March 26 barred their enforcement. Those same reports say Lopez Inc. owns 54.74 per cent of LPZ .  And yet, on the public record visible through PSE EDGE and on LPZ’s own disclosures page, the recent stream of LPZ filings does not show a case-related clarification or a dedicated material-information filing on this governance rupture. What the public record does show are routine items: a March 12 ...

CREIT offers one of the cleaner yield stories in the market

There is a particular appeal to companies that promise excitement in presentation and monotony in cash flow. Citicore Energy REIT, the Philippines’ first energy REIT, belongs squarely in that camp. Its 2025 results show a business that has done what income investors ask of it: keep rents steady, margins fat, and dividends moving in a reassuringly narrow band. Rental income was ₱1.88bn in 2025, barely changed from 2024, while net income was a similarly steady ₱1.43bn . Cash flow from operations, at ₱1.80bn , remained comfortably ahead of the cash actually paid out in dividends. That matters because REIT investors are not buying drama; they are buying durability. CREIT’s annual dividend has shown precisely that quality. The company paid ₱0.202 a share in 2025, little changed from ₱0.201 in 2024 and up from ₱0.198 in 2023, while continuing its practice of quarterly distributions and maintaining a payout well above the REIT law’s minimum threshold. Since year-end, CREIT has even declar...

Cebu Pacific Finds Its Altitude Again

There are few more reliable tests of corporate stamina than the airline industry. It is a sector where capital intensity, currency swings, fuel volatility and operational fragility can expose weak balance sheets with brutal speed. By that standard, Cebu Pacific’s 2025 numbers matter not simply because they are better than the year before, but because they suggest something more consequential: the Philippine low-cost carrier is beginning to look like a business that has moved beyond recovery and back into disciplined expansion. The headline figures are persuasive. Revenue rose 14.3 per cent to ₱119.9bn , with passenger revenue reaching ₱80.8bn , cargo ₱7.2bn and ancillary sales ₱32.0bn . Net income climbed to roughly ₱12.3bn , more than double the prior year, while operating income advanced 25 per cent to ₱11.5bn . EBITDA reached about ₱30.9bn , implying a margin of 25.8 per cent . These are not the numbers of an airline merely muddling through; they are the numbers of one regaining ...

The Lopezes May Be Quarrelling Over More Than a Mere ₱2 Billion

  At first glance, the latest Lopez family rupture looks oddly small-bore. Bloomberg reported that the dispute inside Lopez Inc. turned on a proposal to use ₱2 billion of reserve funds to inject fresh capital into ABS-CBN , with Federico “Piki” Lopez opposing the move and later challenging his removal as president of the family holding company. The Philippine Daily Inquirer separately reported that a Mandaluyong court has since frozen the board action that sought to replace him, exposing a rare and public split inside one of the country’s most prominent business dynasties. Taken literally, it is a fight over a sum that appears modest against the historical scale of the Lopez name.  But that reading is almost certainly too literal. Families with large, layered corporate structures do not usually go to court, destabilise boards and fracture succession lines over an amount they regard as merely incidental. The more convincing interpretation is that the ₱2 billion is only the...

A Smaller Throne: The Lopez Heirs and the ₱9.4 Billion Fight

There is something almost cruel in the symmetry of the Lopez family’s current drama. One of the Philippines’ most storied business dynasties — a clan whose name once stood for media power, boardroom reach and elite corporate permanence — now finds itself publicly divided over a listed family stake worth only about ₱9.4 billion at prevailing market prices. The immediate trigger is a leadership battle inside Lopez, Inc. , after a court blocked an attempt to remove Federico “Piki” Lopez as president and replace him with Rafael Lopez , in a dispute involving a faction aligned with Eugenio “Gabby” Lopez III . But beneath the procedural arguments and family alignments lies a harder truth: this is a contest over the last concentrated lever of Lopez control.  The arithmetic is stark. The Top 100 shareholders report for Lopez Holdings Corp. shows that Lopez, Inc. holds  2,473,707,550 shares in aggregate, spread across four registered lines. Against 4,491,233,837 outstanding shares ,...

CIC and the danger of being valued on its leanest dividend

Concepcion Industrial Corporation’s balance sheet still looks like the sort of document that income investors like to frame on the wall: ₱2.39bn of cash, only ₱73.35mn of short-term borrowings, no long-term bank debt, a current ratio of 2.04x, and an acid-test ratio of 1.35x . ₱7.77bn of equity provides further ballast, while 2025 operating cash flow of ₱1.26bn comfortably covered the ₱393.7mn cash dividend , leaving the group with both liquidity and room for manoeuvre. That, however, may not be the question the market asks next. The more awkward question is not whether CIC can pay ₱1.00 a share today , but whether investors will continue to believe ₱1.00 deserves to be capitalised as the normal dividend. CIC’s own record offers a reason for doubt: the group paid ₱0.50 in 2023 , then ₱0.70 in 2024 , before returning to ₱1.00 in 2025 and declaring ₱1.00 again in 2026 . If earnings quality keeps deteriorating, the market may stop valuing CIC on the restored payout and begin re-ratin...

GMA7’s Shrinking Dividend May Mean the Stock Has Yet to Bottom

For years, GMA Network was easy to love as a dividend stock. The yield was visible, the cash returns were generous, and the company’s dominant broadcast franchise gave investors confidence that even a no-growth story could still pay handsomely. But markets rarely cling to yesterday’s narrative when the cash story begins to change. GMA7’s latest dividend declaration — ₱0.40 per share for 2026, down from ₱0.50 in 2025 — may look small in absolute terms, yet it matters far more as a signal: the payout trend is now unmistakably lower. That trend did not begin this year. GMA7’s regular cash dividend has moved from ₱1.45 in 2022 to ₱1.10 in 2023 , then to ₱0.60 in 2024 , ₱0.50 in 2025 , and now ₱0.40 in 2026 . That is not a one-off adjustment; it is a multi-year reset in shareholder distributions. Investors who continue to treat GMA7 as though its old payout profile were intact may be anchoring to a story the numbers have already revised. To be fair, the company’s nine-month 2025 results ...