Skip to main content

PLDT trims final dividend to ₱46 as cost and leverage pressures linger

 

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes and is not investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs.


PLDT’s board has approved a final cash dividend of ₱46 per share, bringing total dividends for 2025 to ₱94 per share and framing the payout as 60% of Telco Core EPS—a clear signal that management is prioritizing policy discipline over headline yield.

The adjustment comes as the telco’s operating story remains broadly stable, but the earnings quality underneath shows strain. For full-year 2025, PLDT reported net service revenues of ₱196.2 billion (+1%) and EBITDA of ₱111.2 billion (+3%) with a 52% EBITDA margin, reflecting resilience in data and broadband that now account for 85% of service revenuesYet reported net income fell 7% to ₱30.0 billion, reflecting lower non-core gains and higher non-recurring charges—a reminder that headline stability is not automatically translating into stronger bottom-line momentum. 

The company’s 3Q 2025 SEC filing shows why a conservative dividend stance is defensible. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, net income fell 11% to ₱25.1 billion, and EPS slid to ₱115.83 from ₱129.71 a year earlier. More importantly for dividends, telco core income—the key basis for payouts—declined 5% to ₱25.3 billion, reflecting pressure from higher depreciation and amortization, higher interconnection costs, and higher financing costs.

Wireless, traditionally the cash engine, showed the clearest operational friction: segment revenues declined 3%, the mobile base fell 2% to 59.3 million, and wireless segment net income dropped 36%—a combination that underscores a competitive, value-driven market and weaker monetization at the margin. Fixed-line revenues grew, but profitability still slipped as cost lines—particularly interconnection and financing—proved sticky. 

Balance-sheet optics also matter in dividend debates. As of September 2025, net debt-to-equity rose to 2.40x, and interest coverage weakened to 3.37x, while liquidity ratios remained tight—conditions that often nudge boards to preserve flexibility. By end-2025, PLDT reported net debt of ₱284.7 billion and net debt-to-EBITDA of 2.56x, reinforcing that leverage remains a key lens for capital allocation.

Investor sentiment: yield shock vs. credibility boost

In the near term, a lower dividend can pressure sentiment among income-focused investors, who anchor valuation on dividend certainty and may rotate to alternatives when payouts dip. At the same time, policy-consistent trimming—paired with stable EBITDA, disciplined capex, and stated free cash flow targets—can improve confidence among longer-horizon holders by reducing the risk of a sharper cut later and protecting credit metrics.

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes and is not investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

Power Over Press: How the Lopezes Recycled ₱50 Billion—and Left ABS‑CBN to Fend for Itself

  We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! Disclaimer:  This is for informational purposes and is  not  investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs. What the Lopez Group’s ₱50‑billion decision says about First Gen—and ABS‑CBN When Prime Infrastructure Capital Inc., led by Enrique Razon Jr., completed its ₱50‑billion acquisition of a controlling stake in First Gen’s gas business , it was widely framed as a landmark energy transaction. Less discussed—but no less consequential—was what the Lopez Group chose to do next with the proceeds. Rather than channeling the windfall toward shoring up ABS‑CBN Corp. , the group’s financially strained media arm, the Lopezes effectively recycled that capital back into the energy sector , partnering again with Prime Infra—this time in pumped‑storage hydropower projects that will take year...