Skip to main content

Ramon Ang’s Food Bet Pays Off as SMFB Broadens Beyond Beer

 

San Miguel Food & Beverage’s 2025 results show a subtle but important shift: beer remains the profit king, but the company’s growth engine is moving elsewhere.

San Miguel Food & Beverage Inc. is still, unmistakably, a beer-led profit machine. But its 2025 results show that the company is becoming less dependent on beer for growth, as Food and Spirits supplied most of the incremental earnings momentum during the year. Consolidated revenue rose 5% to ₱419.1 billion, while net income climbed 13% to ₱46.3 billion, with net income attributable to parent shareholders increasing 17% to ₱30.1 billion

The shift is clearest in the segment numbers. Beer remained No. 1 in absolute profit, generating ₱26.5 billion in 2025 net income, far ahead of Food’s ₱11.6 billion and Spirits’ ₱8.7 billion. But Beer’s net income rose only 3%, while Food surged 38% and Spirits increased 20%.

That means the incremental growth story in 2025 was not beer. It was Food and Spirits. Food added roughly ₱3.2 billion in net income versus 2024, while Spirits added around ₱1.45 billion. Beer added only about ₱0.9 billion. Combined, Food and Spirits accounted for roughly 84% of the segment-level net income increase, while Beer contributed only about 16%.


Beer still dominates — but no longer drives the upside

Beer remains SMFB’s most valuable earnings pillar. The business posted ₱155.4 billion in 2025 revenues and ₱32.9 billion in operating income, producing the strongest operating margin among SMFB’s three major businesses. Its net income of ₱26.5 billion still represented more than half of combined segment net income.

But growth was muted. Beer revenue was broadly stable, up only slightly from ₱153.36 billion in 2024, while operating income slipped from ₱33.42 billion to ₱32.9 billion. The company cited pressure on domestic beer from consumer spending constraints and successive excise tax increases, though international beer revenues rose 3% to US$285 million on higher volumes. 

In short, Beer is still SMFB’s cash engine. But in 2025, it was not the business that changed the earnings trajectory.

Food becomes the breakout segment

Food was the year’s standout. Revenue rose 6% to ₱196.3 billion, making it SMFB’s largest business by sales. More importantly, operating income jumped 30% to ₱17.3 billion, while net income climbed 38% to ₱11.6 billion, a record performance for the segment.

The food business benefited from improved feeds performance, strong poultry demand, and solid branded sales from Magnolia Dairy and Coffee and Purefoods meats, including products such as corned beef, luncheon meat, hams, bacon, longanisa and tocino.

The scale of the move matters. Food added about ₱11.3 billion in revenue, more than Beer and Spirits combined. It also contributed roughly ₱4.0 billion of operating income growth, more than offsetting Beer’s slight operating-income decline. 

For a company historically identified with beer, that is a meaningful rebalancing. Food now contributes nearly half of consolidated revenue and is becoming a more important profit driver as margins improve.

Spirits keeps compounding

The Spirits segment, led by Ginebra San Miguel, also strengthened its role in the group. Revenue rose 8% to ₱67.4 billion, operating income increased 21% to ₱10.4 billion, and net income grew 20% to ₱8.7 billion.

Unlike Food, Spirits is not the largest revenue base. But it is a high-margin, increasingly material earnings contributor. Its 2025 net margin was roughly 13%, above Food’s approximately 6%, though still below Beer’s margin profile. 

The company attributed the Spirits performance mainly to effective pricing and stable volumes. That combination is important: it suggests Ginebra is not relying only on volume growth, but also on pricing power and brand resilience. 

The new SMFB mix

SMFB’s 2025 mix shows a company with three different engines:

  • Beer: the dominant profit and cash-flow base
  • Food: the biggest revenue platform and fastest earnings mover
  • Spirits: a smaller but high-margin growth contributor

Based on 2025 figures, Food generated about 47% of SMFB’s consolidated revenue, Beer about 37%, and Spirits around 16%. But on segment net income, Beer still led with roughly 57%, followed by Food at about 25% and Spirits at about 19%.

That split captures the transition. SMFB is not becoming a non-beer company. Rather, it is becoming a broader consumer staples platform where Beer anchors profitability, while Food and Spirits increasingly determine growth.

Why this matters for valuation and dividends

For investors, the less beer-dependent profile matters because Beer faces structural headwinds from excise taxes and mature domestic demand. If SMFB were still relying mainly on Beer for growth, earnings expansion would be more constrained. But Food and Spirits now provide alternative growth paths.

The consolidated numbers support that view. SMFB grew sales by only 5%, but gross profit rose 8%, operating income increased 9%, EBITDA grew 10% to ₱80.6 billion, and net income rose 13%. That shows the company delivered margin expansion, not just volume growth. 

The 2025 results also strengthen SMFB’s dividend story. Parent-attributable net income rose to ₱30.1 billion, or ₱5.10 per share, while the company remained supported by a diversified earnings base across Beer, Food and Spirits. 

Bottom line

Historically, SMFB’s profit story was simple: Beer dominated. In 2025, Beer still dominated in absolute peso terms. But the growth story changed.

Food delivered the largest improvement in revenue, operating income and net income. Spirits added another layer of high-margin earnings growth. Beer remained the anchor, but Food and Spirits did the heavy lifting.

That makes 2025 a potentially important inflection point for SMFB: the company is still beer-powered, but no longer beer-dependent for growth.

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes and is not investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

Lopez, Gokongwei, Gatchalian, Romualdez: The PCIBank Boardroom Drama

  By early 1999, PCIBank had become more than one of the Philippines’ largest lenders; it had become a test of whether a major bank could remain stable when its ownership rested on a fragile balance between two business clans. Publicly accessible historical sources identify Eugenio Lopez Jr. as chairman and John Gokongwei Jr. as vice-chairman of PCIBank before the sale to Equitable, showing that the institution was effectively run through a dual-center power structure at the top.  What happened beneath that formal structure is harder to document with certainty. It was allegedly governed by a shareholder arrangement between the Lopez and Gokongwei groups that allowed the two camps to share control of PCIBank, with Mr Lopez as chairman and Mr Gokongwei, though vice-chairman, allegedly exercising influence through the bank’s executive committee. We have not found the actual shareholder agreement in the public sources reviewed here, so that part of the story should be trea...