Skip to main content

The quiet winner behind $ICT’s roar: $ANS

 


We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes and is not investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs.


There are rallies that announce themselves with fireworks, and then there are rallies that quietly rearrange the scoreboard for everyone who had the good sense—or the patience—to already be on the field.

International Container Terminal Services, Inc. (ICT) has been the loud kind lately. At ₱680 a share (as of Feb. 20, 2026), it’s the sort of valuation that doesn’t just lift a stock—it reshapes the pecking order of portfolios that hold it. And as ICT climbs, the spotlight naturally falls on the usual suspects: the founders, the nominee accounts, the insiders whose names the market knows by heart. 

But one of the most interesting beneficiaries isn’t a port operator at all.

It’s A. Soriano Corporation (ANS)—a holding company that, on most trading days, sits in the background while its investments do the talking. One of those investments just happens to be ICT: 18,850,637 shares, which is roughly 0.92% of the company, based on the Top 100 stockholders list. 

That number doesn’t sound like a control stake—and it isn’t. But in a market where size is often measured in liquidity and narrative, it’s plenty large enough to matter in pesos.

A stake that gets louder as prices go up

At ₱680, ANS’ ICT holding translates to a market value of roughly: 18,850,637 shares × ₱680 ≈ ₱12.82 billion

That’s the kind of figure that changes how investors should read a holding company. Not because ANS will suddenly become “about ports,” but because a single name can swing the optics of the balance sheet and the mood of earnings season when valuations are moving fast. 

And ANS is not shy about the importance of ICT when the numbers cooperate. In its FY2024 Annual Report, management explicitly pointed to ICTSI as a “significant contributor” to the exceptional performance of its financial holdings and even noted ICTSI’s strong price move during the year. 

That’s the key phrase—financial holdings—because it tells you where the rally shows up.

Paper gains: the kind of “earnings” that arrive without a sale

Here’s where the accounting matters. ANS carries its listed equity portfolio (which includes ICT) under fair value through profit or loss (FVPL)—meaning the company measures those investments at market value, and changes in valuation flow through the income statement rather than being tucked away quietly elsewhere.

So when ICT’s price goes up, ANS doesn’t need to sell anything to look like it “earned” something. The gain exists on paper—real in economic terms, unrealized in cash terms—and it can still boost reported profitability because FVPL runs through P&L.

You see that mechanism in ANS’ disclosures. In FY2024, ANS reported a sizable gain on an increase in market values of FVPL investments at the consolidated level—an aggregated line that reflects the lift from quoted equities as they repriced. And management’s narrative doesn’t leave much doubt about which holding did most of the heavy lifting: ICTSI is singled out as a major driver of that investment performance. 

This is what markets do at extremes: they turn patient positioning into headline results. And they turn “boring” balance-sheet stakes into something that reads, for a moment, like operating momentum.

But there’s a second benefit—less glamorous, more dependable.

The dividend stream: cash that doesn’t care about sentiment

If paper gains are the applause, dividends are the cash register.

ICT declared a cash dividend of ₱14.16 per share (approved March 6, 2025; payable March 28, 2025). If ANS holds 18,850,637 shares, the annualized “what this stake can throw off” math becomes very tangible: 18,850,637 shares × ₱14.16 ≈ ₱266.9 million 

Call it about ₱267 million of gross dividends that can accrue to ANS from a dividend of that size.

In other words, ICT doesn’t just lift ANS when prices are euphoric. It can also contribute when the market is boring—because dividends are boring by design. And for a holding company, that’s the point: cash dividends help pay the bills, fund new bets, and support shareholder distributions, even when capital markets are less forgiving.

ANS’ own filings show that dividends from investments are a real component of results (reported in aggregate, not issuer-by-issuer). But for readers looking at ICT’s surge, the more intuitive takeaway is this: ANS owns a slice of a compounding machine, and the machine keeps paying as it compounds. 

So who’s really “winning” when ICT wins?

ICT’s rally is obviously great news for ICT shareholders. But it also creates a second-order effect in the market—a redistribution of bragging rights among companies that hold ICT as an investment rather than as an operating asset.

ANS is one of those companies. Its ICT stake is large enough to matter, and its accounting treatment means market moves can echo through reported earnings in a way that investors notice. Add the dividend stream—real cash, not just mark-to-market optics—and you get a holding-company story that’s suddenly easier to tell in one sentence: As ICT’s valuation soars, ANS is quietly getting richer—on paper through FVPL gains, and in cash through dividends. 

The market will keep debating whether ICT at these levels is “too expensive” or “still justified.” That’s what markets do. But the ANS angle is less about predicting ICT’s next tick and more about recognizing what’s already happened: a well-placed minority stake can become a major narrative lever when a blue-chip compounder enters a new valuation regime. 

And sometimes, the best winners aren’t the ones making the noise. They’re the ones who were already holding.

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes and is not investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

Power Over Press: How the Lopezes Recycled ₱50 Billion—and Left ABS‑CBN to Fend for Itself

  We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! Disclaimer:  This is for informational purposes and is  not  investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs. What the Lopez Group’s ₱50‑billion decision says about First Gen—and ABS‑CBN When Prime Infrastructure Capital Inc., led by Enrique Razon Jr., completed its ₱50‑billion acquisition of a controlling stake in First Gen’s gas business , it was widely framed as a landmark energy transaction. Less discussed—but no less consequential—was what the Lopez Group chose to do next with the proceeds. Rather than channeling the windfall toward shoring up ABS‑CBN Corp. , the group’s financially strained media arm, the Lopezes effectively recycled that capital back into the energy sector , partnering again with Prime Infra—this time in pumped‑storage hydropower projects that will take year...