We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!
By the time the world stopped traveling in 2020, Cebu Pacific had already proven it could win in a tough market. What happened next—grounding, losses, reinvention, and a return to profitability—reads like a case study in crisis finance for airlines.
Before the Storm: A Pre‑Pandemic Engine Built for Scale
In the years just before COVID‑19, Cebu Pacific (Cebu Air, Inc.) was executing the kind of playbook that separates enduring low‑cost carriers from fare-sale wonders: high load factors, steady volume growth, and disciplined network expansion. In 2018, the airline carried 20.28 million passengers with an 85% seat load factor, posting ₱74.1 billion in revenues despite sharp headwinds in fuel, currency, and airport constraints. The company remained profitable, even as volatility squeezed margins—an early signal of operating resilience under pressure.
By 2019, Cebu Pacific’s recovery was emphatic. Passenger count climbed to 22.47 million, load factor improved to 86.4%, and revenues rose to ₱84.8 billion. Profitability surged to ₱9.12 billion in net income, with management highlighting the benefits of more favorable fuel and currency conditions and improved operational performance. In short, Cebu Pacific entered 2020 with momentum, liquidity, and a fleet and network strategy designed to “upgauge” capacity and keep unit costs low.
A Business Model Stress Test: When COVID Grounded Aviation
Then came 2020—a year when airline economics were turned upside down by travel restrictions and evaporating passenger confidence. Cebu Pacific’s own numbers tell the story: flights dropped from 143,897 in 2019 to 41,804 in 2020, while passengers fell from 22.5 million to 5.0 million. Revenues plunged to ₱22.6 billion (down roughly three‑quarters year‑on‑year), and the company posted an operating loss of ₱20.77 billion and a net loss of ₱22.24 billion. Management described it as the first operating loss since becoming a public company, a sharp reversal from the profits of 2019.
The liquidity hit was equally stark. Cebu Pacific ended 2019 with around ₱18.2 billion in cash and cash equivalents, but by end‑2020 cash fell to ₱4.3 billion—the kind of compression that forces hard decisions fast. When airlines lose scale, fixed costs don’t disappear; they simply become heavier. Cebu Pacific faced the same structural reality as its global peers: the need to keep paying for aircraft, maintenance programs, staff, and systems—even when planes aren’t flying.
The Financial Playbook: How Cebu Pacific Managed the Fallout
1) Turning “Cash Burn” into “Cash Runway”
What separates a survivable airline crisis from a fatal one is runway: how long the company can fund operations while demand rebuilds. Cebu Pacific moved quickly on a multi‑pronged plan: right‑sizing its fleet and network, deferring aircraft deliveries, and preserving unused aircraft in storage—moves explicitly framed under its “future size and shape” strategy. The point wasn’t just cost-cutting; it was aligning capacity and obligations with a smaller market, without permanently damaging the airline’s ability to scale back up.
2) Cargo as a Shock Absorber
While most passenger operations were impaired, Cebu Pacific leaned on cargo more aggressively than expected. In 2020, cargo contributed ₱5.4 billion—about 24% of total revenue—as the airline used freighters, hybrid cargo flights, and even reconfigured aircraft to carry more freight. Cargo didn’t replace passenger revenue, but it helped soften the blow and kept aircraft utilization alive during a period when people simply couldn’t fly.
3) Funding the Gap: Capital Raises and Liquidity Backstops
By 2021, Cebu Pacific strengthened its liquidity position through major fundraising and financing steps documented in its filings: a ₱12.5 billion convertible preferred shares offering, and a US$250 million convertible bond investment involving institutional partners, alongside broader liquidity management and payment restructuring efforts. These moves signaled a realistic view of recovery timing: in a prolonged crisis, the goal is not “profit now,” but “survive long enough to profit later.”
4) Customer Liabilities: Managing Refunds Without Breaking Trust
A subtle but vital part of pandemic finance was managing passenger disruptions. Cebu Pacific expanded flexible options (rebooking, travel funds, longer validity windows) to balance two pressures: customer trust and cash preservation. In airline terms, that means converting immediate cash refunds into deferred service obligations—an approach that can protect liquidity while keeping customers inside the brand ecosystem. [
The Turnaround: From Survival Mode to Profitability
The clearest evidence of “good crisis management” is what happens after restrictions lift. Cebu Pacific’s results show a painful but orderly arc: losses continued through the recovery phase, improved as demand returned, and then flipped back to profit.
By 2023, Cebu Pacific recorded ₱90.6 billion in revenues and returned to profitability with ₱7.9 billion net income and ₱8.6 billion operating income—described by management as a significant recovery from 2022 losses. That rebound matters because it indicates operating leverage returned: as capacity and load factors improved, revenue began to outrun costs again.
In 2024, profitability held, even as the airline invested heavily in fleet and network expansion. Cebu Pacific posted ₱104.9 billion in total revenue, ₱9.2 billion operating income, and ₱5.4 billion net income. The company emphasized that margins were pressured by higher financing costs and growth investments, but the headline remains powerful: Cebu Pacific stayed profitable while scaling and ended 2024 with improved equity and an expanding network footprint.
Where It Stands “Now”: Strong Growth and Rebuilt Equity (2025 YTD)
The most telling metric for post‑crisis recovery isn’t just profit—it’s balance sheet repair. Public market financial reports show Cebu Air’s stockholders’ equity rising to ~₱16.1 billion as of Sept 30, 2025, up from about ₱10.0 billion at end‑2024, alongside a sharp improvement in retained earnings. That’s what “pandemic recovery” looks like in accounting terms: losses worked off, capital rebuilt, and retained earnings growing again.
Operationally and financially, Cebu Pacific’s 9M 2025 performance shows continued strength: ₱87.6 billion in revenue (+18% YoY), 20.0 million passengers (+14% YoY), and ~84.8% load factor. Net income for the first nine months reached ~₱9.5 billion, more than doubling year‑on‑year as reported by both market disclosures and press coverage. Seasonality still shows up in Q3 (typically weaker), but the year‑to‑date trend underscores that Cebu Pacific has regained scale and profitability in a durable way.
What Made the Difference: Three Lessons from Cebu Pacific’s Crisis Finance
Lesson 1: Liquidity is a strategy, not a spreadsheet
Cebu Pacific treated liquidity as the core survival variable—cutting cash burn, restructuring payments, and raising capital to outlast the demand shock. The end‑2020 cash crunch became a turning point for decisive action, and later years show the benefits in restored profitability and improving equity.
Lesson 2: Recovery belongs to those who stay investable
The airline didn’t just “wait it out.” It pursued fundraising and balance‑sheet actions that kept it investable and operationally relevant—so that when demand returned, Cebu Pacific could scale quickly rather than rebuild from scratch. The 2023–2025 performance arc reflects that readiness.
Lesson 3: Low‑cost carriers win by protecting unit economics
Cebu Pacific’s post‑pandemic emphasis on ancillary revenue growth, fleet modernization, and network breadth shows classic LCC discipline: keep the cost base competitive and let demand growth do the rest. In 2024, passenger revenue and ancillaries together powered a ₱104.9B topline, while 2025 year‑to‑date results show strong demand capture at high load factors.
From “EveryJuan Flies” to “EveryJuan Flies Again”
Cebu Pacific’s pre‑pandemic performance demonstrated scale and profitability; its pandemic response demonstrated financial realism; and its post‑pandemic results demonstrate a return to durable earnings power. Airlines don’t get many second chances after shocks of this magnitude. Cebu Pacific appears to have earned one by managing liquidity, resetting obligations, leaning on cargo and flexibility tools, and then returning to growth with a fleet and network built to compete.
We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!
Comments
Post a Comment