Skip to main content

Rate Relief, Real Returns: Who Wins as the BSP Cuts to 4.5%


We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!

The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) delivered another 25‑bp rate cut today, bringing the policy rate to 4.5%—its fifth trim in this easing cycle and a clear signal that officials are leaning dovish to cushion a year of weaker growth and benign inflation. For listed Philippine companies, that shift unlocks a new pecking order of beneficiaries: property developers and REITs at the top, banks close behind, and telcos and power names improving their free‑cash‑flow math as borrowing costs slide. 


Property: The immediate, broad‑based winner

Lower policy rates translate swiftly into cheaper mortgages, lower hurdle rates for new projects, and improved valuation multiples—a trifecta for developers. Industry analysts have already framed BSP easing as a catalyst for residential demand and commercial activity: more affordable homeownership, revived pre‑selling momentum, and better leasing economics as SMEs regain confidence. That backdrop bodes well for Ayala Land (ALI), SM Prime (SMPH), Megaworld (MEG) and Robinsons Land (RLC)

Two marquee names showcase why falling funding costs matter. ALI has been an active issuer in local debt markets—most recently ₱15B sustainability‑linked bonds—and carries a diversified mix of residential, estates, malls, offices, and hotels to absorb recovery across segments. SMPH continues to fund expansion with peso bonds priced around 5.9–6.3% across 2030–2035 tenors, plus a ₱100B 2025 capex plan focused on malls and integrated developments—exactly the kind of growth that is easier to finance as rates step down. 

Beyond funding, the product mix is aligning with the cycle. Recent sector notes point to a pivot toward premium projects where demand proved more resilient than in mass housing; easing rates should progressively re‑open affordability at the mid‑market while keeping high‑end buyers engaged. Together, that supports pre‑sales normalizing from post‑pandemic drags and helps developers re‑price risk at lower discount rates. 


REITs: Yield vehicles re‑rate when risk‑free falls

REITs are essentially spread businesses: they pay investors a dividend funded by rents, and they finance assets using debt. When the policy rate and the risk‑free curve step down, listed REIT yields become relatively more attractive, and interest expense declines on variable‑rate and refinanced borrowings. Expect improved sentiment for AREIT, RCR, FILRT, MREIT, and DDMP, with the best‑positioned names showing strong WALE, visible rent escalations, and prudent leverage. Property commentaries have already flagged this dynamic—lower rates spur portfolio activity and can lift REIT valuations as discount rates compress. 


Banks: NIMs may edge down, but volume and trading gains step up

For banks, the rate story is nuanced. Net interest margins (NIMs) can compress modestly as asset yields drift lower, yet Philippine pass‑through is sticky—funding costs (especially CASA deposits) often reprice slower than policy rates, cushioning near‑term margin pressure. Meanwhile, easing supports loan growth and can unlock trading/OCI gains on securities as yield curves shift. Fitch’s sector work earlier signaled that delayed, gradual cuts would let banks preserve elevated NIMs longer, with volume tailwinds from consumer credit; local transmission analysis similarly highlights slow funding-cost adjustments given abundant low‑cost deposits. 

  • BPI (BPI): 1H25 net interest income +16%, loans +14% YoY, and NIM expansion to ~4.58% underscore a bank leaning into higher‑yielding retail while keeping capital buffers strong—an attractive setup when rates fall, and volumes rise. 
  • BDO (BDO): Management flagged NIMs as flattish to slightly lower in an easing cycle, but BDO’s CASA ~70%+ and diversified book typically absorb the shift; lower rates also help fee businesses and securities. 
  • Metrobank (MBT): Loan growth +10.8%, trading & FX gains +18% in 9M25, plus a presentation showing falling funding costs offsetting yield pressure—hallmarks of a bank that benefits from gradual easing via volumes and market gains. 
  • China Bank (CBC, formerly CHIB): NIM ~4.58%, net loans +14% YoY, and a sizeable securities book (~₱571B) suggest potential OCI tailwinds and lower funding costs as cuts filter through. 

The macro overlay helps: the BSP’s Dec 11 cut to 4.5% and earlier guidance of data‑dependent easing imply a measured path, which historically is friendlier to bank profitability than sharp, rapid cycles. 


Telcos: Lower interest expense strengthens the free‑cash‑flow story

High‑capex, high‑debt telcos are natural beneficiaries of lower borrowing costs. PLDT (TEL) trimmed 2025 capex to ₱68–73B and is targeting positive FCF by 2026—rate cuts reduce interest expense, ease refinancing risk, and reinforce that trajectory. Globe (GLO) is on track for positive FCF by 2025 with capex down and EBITDA targets intact; lower policy rates nudge debt service lower, improving coverage ratios and dividend visibility. 

For investors, the key is simple: telco service revenues move gradually, but finance costs move with the cycle. As BSP easing progresses, the equity narrative shifts from “capex heavy” to “cash‑flow generative,” an inflection markets typically reward. 


Power & Utilities: Capital intensity meets cheaper capital

Aboitiz Power (AP) illustrates the capital‑intensive end of the market. With ₱78B–₱101B in group capex earmarked for generation and grid investments—and with recent results noting higher financing costs as a profit headwind—BSP cuts directly lower the weighted average cost of capital and ease debt service as projects ramp. For names with long project gestations, even incremental rate relief supports ROE and project IRR math. 


Bottom line: The beneficiaries, ranked

  1. Property Developers & REITs – most immediate re‑rating via mortgage affordability, lower discount rates, and cheaper funding; watch ALI, SMPH, MEG, RLC, plus AREIT, RCR, FILRT, MREIT, DDMP
  2. Banks – modest NIM headwinds offset by sticky funding costs, strong volume, and securities gains; BPI, BDO, MBT, CBC are well placed. 
  3. Telcosinterest expense down, FCF up as capex rolls off; PLDT, Globe stand to benefit. 
  4. Powercost of capital declines aid project economics; Aboitiz Power is a clear case. 

Risks to the view: If easing stalls or reverses due to FX or inflation surprises, banks could see slimmer volume tailwinds, property pre‑sales could hesitate, and REIT re‑rating would pause. But with the BSP signaling a data‑dependent, gradual approach and today’s cut reaffirming a pro‑growth stance, the balance of evidence favors rate‑sensitive winners leading the market into 2026.

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

Power Over Press: How the Lopezes Recycled ₱50 Billion—and Left ABS‑CBN to Fend for Itself

  We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! Disclaimer:  This is for informational purposes and is  not  investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs. What the Lopez Group’s ₱50‑billion decision says about First Gen—and ABS‑CBN When Prime Infrastructure Capital Inc., led by Enrique Razon Jr., completed its ₱50‑billion acquisition of a controlling stake in First Gen’s gas business , it was widely framed as a landmark energy transaction. Less discussed—but no less consequential—was what the Lopez Group chose to do next with the proceeds. Rather than channeling the windfall toward shoring up ABS‑CBN Corp. , the group’s financially strained media arm, the Lopezes effectively recycled that capital back into the energy sector , partnering again with Prime Infra—this time in pumped‑storage hydropower projects that will take year...