PHINMA at a Crossroads: Education Triumphs, But Debt and Losses Cast a Long Shadow

Strong enrollment and strategic partnerships keep PHINMA Education thriving, yet mounting losses in construction, property, and hospitality—and a ballooning debt load—raise tough questions about the company’s future and its share price stability.

By the third quarter of 2025, PHINMA Corporation finds itself walking a tightrope between resilience and vulnerability. The company’s latest SEC filing paints a mixed picture: consolidated revenues slipped to ₱16.31 billion, down 4% from last year, while net income fell to ₱376 million. More troubling for shareholders, the parent company posted a net loss of ₱216 million, translating to a negative EPS of ₱0.64.

The bright spot remains PHINMA Education, which delivered ₱5.27 billion in revenues and ₱1.42 billion in net income—a 26% jump year-on-year—thanks to record enrollment and strategic partnerships, including an ₱825-million infusion from Rise Edu Pte. Ltd. But this success is overshadowed by persistent weaknesses elsewhere.

The Construction Materials Group, once a growth engine, reported a ₱122-million loss amid soft demand, rising input costs, and safeguard duties on imported cement. Property development fared worse, bleeding ₱484 million amid high financing costs and sluggish project completions. Hospitality, too, posted a ₱21-million loss, hurt by lower occupancy and disruptions from expansion.

These operational cracks are deepened by structural risks. PHINMA’s debt-to-equity ratio ballooned to 2.46:1, and interest expenses surged to ₱1.34 billion, signaling mounting financial strain. Liquidity remains tight, with a current ratio below 1.0, while overdue receivables—₱3 billion past 90 days—underscore credit risk.

For investors, these numbers raise uncomfortable questions. High leverage and uneven segment performance could pressure PHINMA’s share price and valuation. Analysts may apply steeper discounts to earnings forecasts, while the market could demand a higher risk premium. Education may be the crown jewel, but its shine is dulled by the drag from construction, property, and hospitality.

The road ahead hinges on execution: turning strategic partnerships into operational gains, restoring profitability in core businesses, and managing debt without sacrificing growth. Until then, PHINMA’s story remains one of promise tempered by peril—a tale investors will watch closely as the year draws to a close.

Subscribe to Support Free & Independent Research

Comments

BDO’s Premium Under Pressure: Why Investors Should Watch CASA, Margins, and Cyber Risk

BDO Unibank has long been the crown jewel of Philippine banking—commanding scale, profitability, and a valuation premium that peers struggle to match. But its latest quarterly filing and sector trends suggest that the next chapter may be more challenging than the last. The Margin Squeeze Begins The first red flag is in the funding mix. Current and savings accounts (CASA)—the cheapest source of funds—slipped from about 71.5% at end-2024 to 66.6% by September 2025. Time deposits surged by nearly ₱300 billion. This isn’t just a footnote; it’s a structural shift that raises funding costs. Combine that with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ rate-cut cycle—policy rate now at 4.75% and likely heading lower—and you have a classic margin squeeze: loan yields fall faster than deposit costs. For a bank with ₱5.27 trillion in assets, even a 10–20 basis point hit to net interest margin (NIM) can shave billions off earnings. Consumer Credit: A Quiet Risk BDO’s consumer book is growing, but so a...

ABS-CBN Faces Financial Crisis as TV5 Exits Over ₱1B Dispute: Why Lopez Group Must Use Its ₱50B Windfall to Rescue Its Media Flagship

TV5’s termination of its partnership with ABS-CBN over a ₱1 billion payment demand exposes deep financial cracks. With ₱13 billion in payables and cash reserves down to ₱718 million, the Lopez Group must act fast—using its ₱50 billion windfall from First Gen’s sale to Enrique Razon—to prevent a collapse that could damage its entire credit reputation. When TV5 , backed by the Manny Pangilinan group , pulled the plug on its partnership with ABS-CBN and demanded a ₱1 billion payment , it wasn’t just a broken deal—it was a warning shot. A signal that the financial cracks in ABS-CBN are widening, and the tremors could shake the entire Lopez Group . The numbers are stark: ABS-CBN’s SEC filing shows ₱13 billion in trade and other payables , a ₱11 billion working capital deficit , and cash reserves down to ₱718 million . These aren’t minor hiccups—they’re existential threats. When a major partner like TV5 walks away over unpaid obligations, others will take notice. Talent agencies, event venue...

From Gas to Media: Why a ₱50‑Billion Windfall Could Be the Lopez Group’s Lifeline

The Weekend Read from the Trading Desk : How upstreaming First Gen’s proceeds to First Philippine Holdings could stabilize ABS‑CBN—and safeguard the conglomerate’s access to bank capital. The moment that changed the calculus When Prime Infrastructure Capital, Inc. reached financial close on November 17–18, 2025, for its ₱50‑billion purchase of a 60% stake in First Gen Corporation’s (FGEN) Batangas gas platform—spanning the Santa Rita, San Lorenzo, San Gabriel, Avion plants and the offshore LNG terminal—the news cycle framed it as an energy transition milestone. But the deal also cracked open a once‑in‑a‑decade capital window for the Lopez Group : with liquidity crystallized at FGEN, the conglomerate can channel cash upstream to First Philippine Holdings (FPH) and redeploy it where reputational risk is highest— ABS‑CBN . Prime Infra’s majority control across the mid‑stream and downstream gas value chain complements its upstream Malampaya operations, while FGEN retains...

the Outsider - PSE Points to Ponder

Search This Blog