Skip to main content

DoubleDragon’s Balancing Act: Growth on Paper, Pressure in Cash


DoubleDragon Corporation’s latest quarterly filing paints a picture of ambition—and exposure. On the surface, the numbers sparkle: revenues surged 63% year-on-year to ₱10.5 billion for the first nine months of 2025, powered by real estate sales and steady rental streams. Net income held at ₱2.55 billion, barely up from last year, but enough to keep the optics positive.

Scratch deeper, and the sheen dulls. Nearly 42% of that revenue came from unrealized fair value gains and tenant penalties—items that look good in a report but don’t pay the bills. Strip those out, and the core engine—rent and hotel operations—struggles to cover a ballooning interest tab. Financing costs doubled to ₱2.39 billion, and in the third quarter alone, they wiped out profits for common shareholders, leaving the parent with a ₱47.7 million loss.

The balance sheet tells its own story: net debt hovers near ₱86 billion, cushioned by equity of ₱101 billion. Bonds issued this year lock in rates north of 7%, some as high as 9.5%, ensuring that interest pressure won’t ease soon. Operating cash flow? Deep in the red at negative ₱7.93 billion, offset only by ₱9 billion in fresh financing. Liquidity ratios look healthy on paper, but the reliance on debt markets is a vulnerability in any tightening cycle.

Receivables ballooned to ₱21.8 billion, with impairment provisions climbing. Penalty income—₱2.5 billion so far—suggests tenants are paying late. Good for accounting, bad for cash. Add to that the execution risk of Hotel101’s global rollout and the long-promised industrial REIT, and you have a company juggling growth narratives with hard realities.

To be fair, DoubleDragon is asset-rich and opportunistic. Investment properties rose to ₱169.6 billion, and its REIT arm continues to spin off dividends. But the question for investors is simple: can recurring cash flows catch up with the financing load before the next refinancing cycle? If leasing momentum and hotel pre-sales deliver, the story holds. If not, the cracks widen.

For now, DoubleDragon remains a case study in modern property playbooks—leveraged growth, valuation-driven earnings, and a race against time to turn paper gains into hard cash. Watch the interest coverage ratio, operating cash flow, and receivables aging. In this game, liquidity isn’t just a metric—it’s survival. 

Subscribe to Support Free & Independent Research

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BDO’s Premium Under Pressure: Why Investors Should Watch CASA, Margins, and Cyber Risk

BDO Unibank has long been the crown jewel of Philippine banking—commanding scale, profitability, and a valuation premium that peers struggle to match. But its latest quarterly filing and sector trends suggest that the next chapter may be more challenging than the last. The Margin Squeeze Begins The first red flag is in the funding mix. Current and savings accounts (CASA)—the cheapest source of funds—slipped from about 71.5% at end-2024 to 66.6% by September 2025. Time deposits surged by nearly ₱300 billion. This isn’t just a footnote; it’s a structural shift that raises funding costs. Combine that with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ rate-cut cycle—policy rate now at 4.75% and likely heading lower—and you have a classic margin squeeze: loan yields fall faster than deposit costs. For a bank with ₱5.27 trillion in assets, even a 10–20 basis point hit to net interest margin (NIM) can shave billions off earnings. Consumer Credit: A Quiet Risk BDO’s consumer book is growing, but so a...
Post a Comment
Read more

ABS-CBN Faces Financial Crisis as TV5 Exits Over ₱1B Dispute: Why Lopez Group Must Use Its ₱50B Windfall to Rescue Its Media Flagship

TV5’s termination of its partnership with ABS-CBN over a ₱1 billion payment demand exposes deep financial cracks. With ₱13 billion in payables and cash reserves down to ₱718 million, the Lopez Group must act fast—using its ₱50 billion windfall from First Gen’s sale to Enrique Razon—to prevent a collapse that could damage its entire credit reputation. When TV5 , backed by the Manny Pangilinan group , pulled the plug on its partnership with ABS-CBN and demanded a ₱1 billion payment , it wasn’t just a broken deal—it was a warning shot. A signal that the financial cracks in ABS-CBN are widening, and the tremors could shake the entire Lopez Group . The numbers are stark: ABS-CBN’s SEC filing shows ₱13 billion in trade and other payables , a ₱11 billion working capital deficit , and cash reserves down to ₱718 million . These aren’t minor hiccups—they’re existential threats. When a major partner like TV5 walks away over unpaid obligations, others will take notice. Talent agencies, event venue...
Post a Comment
Read more

From Gas to Media: Why a ₱50‑Billion Windfall Could Be the Lopez Group’s Lifeline

  The Weekend Read from the Trading Desk : How upstreaming First Gen’s proceeds to First Philippine Holdings could stabilize ABS‑CBN—and safeguard the conglomerate’s access to bank capital. The moment that changed the calculus When Prime Infrastructure Capital, Inc. reached financial close on November 17–18, 2025, for its ₱50‑billion purchase of a 60% stake in First Gen Corporation’s (FGEN) Batangas gas platform—spanning the Santa Rita, San Lorenzo, San Gabriel, Avion plants and the offshore LNG terminal—the news cycle framed it as an energy transition milestone. But the deal also cracked open a once‑in‑a‑decade capital window for the Lopez Group : with liquidity crystallized at FGEN, the conglomerate can channel cash upstream to First Philippine Holdings (FPH) and redeploy it where reputational risk is highest— ABS‑CBN .  Prime Infra’s majority control across the mid‑stream and downstream gas value chain complements its upstream Malampaya operations, while FGEN retains...
Post a Comment
Read more