SSI Group’s Nine-Month Profit Plunges 49% Amid Rising Operating Costs

SSI Group, Inc. reported a sharp decline in profitability for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, as operating expenses surged despite flat revenue growth.

The specialty retailer posted ₱639.8 million in net income, down 49.3% from ₱1.26 billion in the same period last year. Third-quarter earnings fell even steeper, dropping 65% to ₱188.1 million.

Sales remained largely unchanged, inching up 0.7% to ₱20.32 billion, while gross profit improved slightly to ₱9.08 billion, with margins rising to 44.7% from 44.2%. However, operating income plunged 44.9% to ₱914 million as expenses ballooned.

“The increase in costs was driven by store network expansion and technology investments,” SSI said in its quarterly filing.

Operating expenses climbed 12.4% to ₱8.18 billion, fueled by higher rent, depreciation, and personnel costs linked to a 13.6% increase in selling space and the rollout of SAP and ETP enterprise systems. Selling and distribution costs rose to ₱6.58 billion, while general and administrative expenses jumped 17.4% to ₁.60 billion.

The company opened 17 new stores during the quarter, bringing its total to 613 outlets nationwide, and expanded its brand portfolio to 103 names. E-commerce contributed ₱1.57 billion, or 7.7% of total sales.

SSI ended the period with ₱2.78 billion in cash, down from ₱5.14 billion at year-end 2024, after spending ₱1.20 billion on capital expenditures, paying ₱503.6 million in dividends, and repurchasing shares worth ₱50.4 million.

Despite the earnings slump, SSI maintained a net cash position of ₱1.39 billion and a current ratio of 2.11, signaling adequate liquidity ahead of the holiday season, traditionally its strongest quarter.

Outlook / Investor Takeaway

Holiday Quarter Critical: SSI’s inventory build to ₱13.15 billion positions it for peak season sales, but execution risk is high. Strong sell-through and markdown discipline will be key to converting stock into cash.
Margin Recovery Hinges on Cost Control: ERP transition costs and store expansion drove operating margin down to 4.5%. Normalization of G&A and leveraging new stores will determine if margins rebound in Q4.
Liquidity Cushion Intact: Net cash and low leverage (Debt/Equity at 0.08) provide breathing room, but free cash flow needs improvement after negative operating cash flow in 9M25.
Watch Luxury Segment: Luxury and Bridge sales fell 3.8%, signaling discretionary weakness. Performance in this category during the holidays will be a bellwether for 2026.
Valuation Implication: With EPS at ₱0.19 (vs ₱0.38 last year), investors may reassess growth expectations. Near-term upside depends on holiday performance and cost discipline.

Subscribe and Be Part of the Movement

Comments

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company. Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade. By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

From Gas Cash to Mall Control: Will the ₱50B Windfall Backstop Rockwell?

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! There’s a certain poetic symmetry to the Lopez group’s year: on one hand, First Gen’s landmark ₱50‑billion sale of a controlling stake in its gas platform to Enrique Razon’s Prime Infra has been framed as a strategic pivot—cashing out of mature gas assets to fund a cleaner, geothermal-heavy future. On the other, Rockwell Land’s ₱21.6‑billion acquisition of control over Alabang Town Center reads like a bold bet on premium retail scale and long-horizon redevelopment. Put them side by side and a provocative question practically writes itself: Is this where the “₱50B windfall” will ultimately go—straight into a mega-mall acquisition that Rockwell can’t comfortably carry on its own? To be clear, the ₱50B is not Rockwell’s money . It’s First Gen’s proceeds from a transaction involving gas plants and an LNG terminal, with First Gen explicitly pointing to renewable energy expansion (notably geothermal) as ...

the Outsider - PSE Points to Ponder

Search This Blog