Skip to main content

Shakey’s Bold Expansion: Growth at a Cost


Shakey’s Pizza Asia Ventures Inc. (PSE: PIZZA) has long been a household name in the Philippines, and its latest quarterly filing shows why: systemwide sales surged 14% to ₱17.7 billion, and net revenue climbed 12% to ₱11.24 billion for the first nine months of 2025. On the surface, this looks like a victory lap for a brand celebrating its 50th year in the country.

But dig deeper into the numbers, and a more nuanced story emerges—one of growth bought at a price.


The Expansion Gamble

Shakey’s is in the middle of an aggressive rollout, adding new stores, renovating existing ones, and expanding its multi-brand portfolio, which includes Peri-Peri Charcoal Chicken and Potato Corner. This strategy is designed to cement its dominance in casual dining and kiosks, but it comes with short-term pain.

The company’s gross margin slipped to 22.6% from 24.3%, and operating margin fell to 8.9%, despite double-digit revenue growth. Why? Pre-opening costs and renovation expenses—the unavoidable toll of rapid expansion. Management admits as much in its SEC filing: improving input costs were overshadowed by network investments.


Debt and Interest: The Hidden Weight

Expansion isn’t cheap. Shakey’s poured ₱693 million into capital expenditures this year, and while operating cash flow remains strong at ₱1.03 billion, the company leaned on debt to keep the engine running. Interest expense jumped 18% to ₱348 million, fueled by a loan repricing to 6.3% and short-term borrowings swelling to ₱1.32 billion.

This financing burden shaved pretax margins and dragged EPS down to ₱0.34 from ₱0.40. Yet, in a move that will please shareholders but raise eyebrows among analysts, Shakey’s still declared a ₱ 0.20-per-share dividend—tightening internal funding at a time when liquidity is already under pressure.


Liquidity: A Thinner Cushion

Cash reserves fell to ₱821 million from ₱1.32 billion at year-end 2024. The current ratio eased to 1.3x, signaling a slimmer buffer against short-term obligations. While the company’s cash conversion cycle improved to 17 days—a testament to operational discipline—the reality is clear: expansion has narrowed financial flexibility.


The Bigger Picture

None of this means Shakey’s is in trouble. Its core EBITDA rose 14% to ₱1.8 billion, and its franchising model remains a powerful lever for long-term growth. But investors should recognize the trade-off: today’s margin squeeze and liquidity strain are the price of tomorrow’s market share.

The question is whether the payoff will justify the cost. If new stores ramp up quickly and financing costs stabilize, Shakey’s could emerge stronger than ever. If not, the company may find itself juggling debt, leases, and shareholder expectations in a tougher consumer environment.


Bottom line: Shakey’s is betting big—and for now, the bet is eating into margins and cash. For growth-focused investors, that may be acceptable. For those who prize near-term profitability, caution is warranted.

Subscribe to Support Free & Independent Research

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

From Gas Cash to Mall Control: Will the ₱50B Windfall Backstop Rockwell?

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! There’s a certain poetic symmetry to the Lopez group’s year: on one hand, First Gen’s landmark ₱50‑billion sale of a controlling stake in its gas platform to Enrique Razon’s Prime Infra has been framed as a strategic pivot—cashing out of mature gas assets to fund a cleaner, geothermal-heavy future. On the other, Rockwell Land’s ₱21.6‑billion acquisition of control over Alabang Town Center reads like a bold bet on premium retail scale and long-horizon redevelopment. Put them side by side and a provocative question practically writes itself: Is this where the “₱50B windfall” will ultimately go—straight into a mega-mall acquisition that Rockwell can’t comfortably carry on its own?   To be clear, the ₱50B is not Rockwell’s money . It’s First Gen’s proceeds from a transaction involving gas plants and an LNG terminal, with First Gen explicitly pointing to renewable energy expansion (notably geothermal) as ...