Skip to main content

AREIT holders may have missed the difference between MM and AREIT, AREIT may have to sink further until it finds the yield.

MM and AREIT are two different public offerings, thus, the difference in results. Holders of AREIT may have missed the difference of the two public offerings.

MM is a pure initial public offering. It means shares offered to the public comes from the unissued shares of MM or the so called “primary shares.” All the proceeds of the MM initial public offering went into the coffers of MM. The proceeds of the public offering more than doubled the size of MM’s balance sheet. From 0.9 Billion prior to the IPO to around 2.4 Billion post-IPO.

Because the proceeds of MM’s IPO went to its coffers, MM will be able to utilize the proceeds of its IPO to grow the business and create more value to its shareholders including those who participated in the IPO. The more value a company creates the more the market rewards, thus, the rise in value of the company’s shares.

In AREIT, the total proceeds of around 13.5 Billion Pesos of the public offering went to Ayala Land, Inc. (ALI). That was so because 90.5% of the shares offered to the public were secondary shares owned by Ayala Land, Inc. (ALI). ALI was selling its AREIT shares to the public. Only 9.5% or 47,864,000 shares of the total shares in the public offering were primary shares. The proceeds of the sale of the primary shares were also used to acquire an office building from ALI. So in all the entire proceeds of the AREIT offering went to ALI.

The impact would have been different if the IPO were all primary shares. In AREIT if the IPO were all primary shares then its balance sheet would have also doubled and AREIT will have 13.5 Billion of new capital to grow the business. If that was the case the shares would have skyrocketed because AREIT with 13.5 Billion Pesos of new capital could grow tremendously. But that was not the case.

In advance markets REITs are known for their yield and their shares moves up and down chasing the yield. This is so because REITs are typically mandated to distribute at least 90% of its distributable net income to it shareholder and their assets are restricted to mostly income producing real estate. REITs are designed to own income producing real estate and the income from those assets are mandated to be distributed to shareholders. That is why they are known for their yield and the yield typically guides a REIT’s share price.

In the case of AREIT, all the talks about its yield are all based on speculations. There are so many talks that the yield is like this and that but those are all speculations from brokers, analyst, and commenters. AREIT’s yield is zero for now considering that no dividend has yet been declared by AREIT.

AREIT has been very clear in its final REIT plan that the property yield on real estate held by AREIT is not equivalent to distribution yield on the shares and that AREIT may not be able to make distributions.

There is no yield for AREIT until AREIT makes that dividend declaration. For now AREIT’s share price maybe guided by the no yield yet and its shares maybe heading towards the no yield yet territory. That could be so until a distribution is declared and when a distribution is declared its share price will move towards the yield the market desires.

Disclaimer: This is an independent analysis for discussion purposes with the aim of giving stock traders and investors an independent perspective.  Accuretti Systems Inc. does not hold any shares of Merry Mart, AREIT and Ayala Land, Inc..

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

ABS-CBN Faces Financial Crisis as TV5 Exits Over ₱1B Dispute: Why Lopez Group Must Use Its ₱50B Windfall to Rescue Its Media Flagship

TV5’s termination of its partnership with ABS-CBN over a ₱1 billion payment demand exposes deep financial cracks. With ₱13 billion in payables and cash reserves down to ₱718 million, the Lopez Group must act fast—using its ₱50 billion windfall from First Gen’s sale to Enrique Razon—to prevent a collapse that could damage its entire credit reputation. When TV5 , backed by the Manny Pangilinan group , pulled the plug on its partnership with ABS-CBN and demanded a ₱1 billion payment , it wasn’t just a broken deal—it was a warning shot. A signal that the financial cracks in ABS-CBN are widening, and the tremors could shake the entire Lopez Group . The numbers are stark: ABS-CBN’s SEC filing shows ₱13 billion in trade and other payables , a ₱11 billion working capital deficit , and cash reserves down to ₱718 million . These aren’t minor hiccups—they’re existential threats. When a major partner like TV5 walks away over unpaid obligations, others will take notice. Talent agencies, event venue...

BDO’s Premium Under Pressure: Why Investors Should Watch CASA, Margins, and Cyber Risk

BDO Unibank has long been the crown jewel of Philippine banking—commanding scale, profitability, and a valuation premium that peers struggle to match. But its latest quarterly filing and sector trends suggest that the next chapter may be more challenging than the last. The Margin Squeeze Begins The first red flag is in the funding mix. Current and savings accounts (CASA)—the cheapest source of funds—slipped from about 71.5% at end-2024 to 66.6% by September 2025. Time deposits surged by nearly ₱300 billion. This isn’t just a footnote; it’s a structural shift that raises funding costs. Combine that with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ rate-cut cycle—policy rate now at 4.75% and likely heading lower—and you have a classic margin squeeze: loan yields fall faster than deposit costs. For a bank with ₱5.27 trillion in assets, even a 10–20 basis point hit to net interest margin (NIM) can shave billions off earnings. Consumer Credit: A Quiet Risk BDO’s consumer book is growing, but so a...