Skip to main content

AREIT holders may have missed the difference between MM and AREIT, AREIT may have to sink further until it finds the yield.

MM and AREIT are two different public offerings, thus, the difference in results. Holders of AREIT may have missed the difference of the two public offerings.

MM is a pure initial public offering. It means shares offered to the public comes from the unissued shares of MM or the so called “primary shares.” All the proceeds of the MM initial public offering went into the coffers of MM. The proceeds of the public offering more than doubled the size of MM’s balance sheet. From 0.9 Billion prior to the IPO to around 2.4 Billion post-IPO.

Because the proceeds of MM’s IPO went to its coffers, MM will be able to utilize the proceeds of its IPO to grow the business and create more value to its shareholders including those who participated in the IPO. The more value a company creates the more the market rewards, thus, the rise in value of the company’s shares.

In AREIT, the total proceeds of around 13.5 Billion Pesos of the public offering went to Ayala Land, Inc. (ALI). That was so because 90.5% of the shares offered to the public were secondary shares owned by Ayala Land, Inc. (ALI). ALI was selling its AREIT shares to the public. Only 9.5% or 47,864,000 shares of the total shares in the public offering were primary shares. The proceeds of the sale of the primary shares were also used to acquire an office building from ALI. So in all the entire proceeds of the AREIT offering went to ALI.

The impact would have been different if the IPO were all primary shares. In AREIT if the IPO were all primary shares then its balance sheet would have also doubled and AREIT will have 13.5 Billion of new capital to grow the business. If that was the case the shares would have skyrocketed because AREIT with 13.5 Billion Pesos of new capital could grow tremendously. But that was not the case.

In advance markets REITs are known for their yield and their shares moves up and down chasing the yield. This is so because REITs are typically mandated to distribute at least 90% of its distributable net income to it shareholder and their assets are restricted to mostly income producing real estate. REITs are designed to own income producing real estate and the income from those assets are mandated to be distributed to shareholders. That is why they are known for their yield and the yield typically guides a REIT’s share price.

In the case of AREIT, all the talks about its yield are all based on speculations. There are so many talks that the yield is like this and that but those are all speculations from brokers, analyst, and commenters. AREIT’s yield is zero for now considering that no dividend has yet been declared by AREIT.

AREIT has been very clear in its final REIT plan that the property yield on real estate held by AREIT is not equivalent to distribution yield on the shares and that AREIT may not be able to make distributions.

There is no yield for AREIT until AREIT makes that dividend declaration. For now AREIT’s share price maybe guided by the no yield yet and its shares maybe heading towards the no yield yet territory. That could be so until a distribution is declared and when a distribution is declared its share price will move towards the yield the market desires.

Disclaimer: This is an independent analysis for discussion purposes with the aim of giving stock traders and investors an independent perspective.  Accuretti Systems Inc. does not hold any shares of Merry Mart, AREIT and Ayala Land, Inc..

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ayalas didn’t “lose” Alabang Town Center—They cashed out like disciplined capital allocators

We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! If you only read the headline—Ayala Land exits Alabang Town Center (ATC)—you might mistake it for a retreat, or worse, a concession to the Madrigal–Bayot clan. But the paper trail tells a more nuanced story: the Ayalas weren’t unwilling to buy out the Madrigals; they simply didn’t need to—and didn’t want to at that price, at that point in the cycle. And that’s exactly where the contrast with the Lopezes begins. In late December 2025, Lopez-controlled Rockwell Land stepped in to buy a controlling 74.8% stake in the ATC-owning company for ₱21.6 billion—explicitly pitching long-term redevelopment upside as the prize. A week earlier, Ayala Land (ALI) signed an agreement to sell its 50% stake for ₱13.5 billion after an unsolicited premium offer —and said it would redeploy proceeds into its leasing growth pipeline and return of capital to stakeholders. Same asset. Two mindsets. 1) Why buy what you already co...

From Meralco to Rockwell: How the Lopezes Restructured to Put Rockwell Land Under FPH’s Control

  The Big Picture In the span of just a few years, the Lopez family executed a complex corporate restructuring that shifted Rockwell Land Corporation firmly under First Philippine Holdings Corporation (FPH) —even as they parted with “precious” equity in Manila Electric Company (Meralco) to make it happen. The strategy wove together property dividends, special block sales, and the monetization of legacy assets, ultimately consolidating one of the Philippines’ most admired property brands inside the Lopezes’ flagship holding company.  Laying the Groundwork (1996–2009) Rockwell began as First Philippine Realty and Development Corporation and was rebranded Rockwell Land in 1995. A pivotal capital infusion in September 1996 brought in three major shareholders— Meralco , FPH , and Benpres (now Lopez Holdings) —setting up a tripartite structure that would endure for more than a decade.  By August 2009 , the Lopezes made a decisive move: Benpres sold its 24.5% Rockwell stake...

Power Over Press: How the Lopezes Recycled ₱50 Billion—and Left ABS‑CBN to Fend for Itself

  We’ve been blogging for free. If you enjoy our content, consider supporting us! Disclaimer:  This is for informational purposes and is  not  investment advice. Figures are taken from company disclosures and exchange data; valuation ratios include the author’s calculations based on cited inputs. What the Lopez Group’s ₱50‑billion decision says about First Gen—and ABS‑CBN When Prime Infrastructure Capital Inc., led by Enrique Razon Jr., completed its ₱50‑billion acquisition of a controlling stake in First Gen’s gas business , it was widely framed as a landmark energy transaction. Less discussed—but no less consequential—was what the Lopez Group chose to do next with the proceeds. Rather than channeling the windfall toward shoring up ABS‑CBN Corp. , the group’s financially strained media arm, the Lopezes effectively recycled that capital back into the energy sector , partnering again with Prime Infra—this time in pumped‑storage hydropower projects that will take year...